Posts Tagged ‘2011 PR Plan’

Let’s say you’ve adopted every change outlined in this 10-post series on 2011 PR plans.  You’ve recognized the need to change the infrastructure of your plan, changed “Audiences to Communities,” upgraded your message bible for SEO, adopted the scientific method for communications,  discovered that to live your corporate values you MUST use social media, you have 20 new social media metrics, adopted a can-do attitude regarding regulatory issues for social media, have a plan for social media mistakes,  will be using perpetual press releases, and are planning to crack some silos to make social media work for your company. (Whew!)

Now ask yourself the three most critical questions you face in 2011:

1. The PR industry you grew up in has changed forever.  Has your skill set, responsibilities and goals changed as much?

2. The channels that your customers, investors and employees use to access information are completely different from two years ago.  Is your staff and budget re-allocated proportionately?

3. Your competitors are either behind on social media, upgrading their current efforts, or far ahead of you.  Does your 2011 plan enable you to leave them far behind, jump ahead or leapfrog them?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Can a PR department get through 2011 without working with sales, customer service, investor relations, research, compliance and legal departments on at least a few social media issues?  No. Will those issues be easier to manage if formal networks of coordination are set up now?  Absolutely.

And I’m not talking about the department head to department head network that already exists. But the execution folks that are on the ground, online, and know the cultural mores that present unique problems and opportunities.

So as you assemble your 2011 plan, how about reaching out to those other departments and proposing a little council be set up? As always, ask for volunteers. Only the people who want to try something new will raise their hands, and it’s that little oomph that will stir them to openly share questions and learnings about what they’re seeing in social media land.

Because no one department can master social media on it’s own. And the truly amazing things social media can deliver only happen when everyone’s at the table.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

It’s fashionable to bash press releases in social media circles, but how about a constructive look at how to integrate them into your 2011 social media efforts? Surprise:  this decades-old tool is more useful than you think.

The critical conceptual change to embrace is that the news cycle doesn’t work the same way in social media.  With journalists, they get the release, there’s a spike in coverage and then the story becomes “old” in a few days, never to be reported on again.

But once they’re online, press releases start a wave of conversation that can go on for weeks, months, even years.  Why?  Because to customers, what’s “new” isn’t as important as what’s relevant, interesting, and useful.  This phenomenon is especially prevalent in B2B because the topics are more complex and sales cycles are much longer.

(literally, back of the napkin sketch)

Be prepared to see a steady trickle of chatter for several months, and a series of flare ups in conversation when someone asks a question, provokes debate or references your news with a link about something else.

Funny thing is, it’s probably already happening with your releases from years ago!  In this way, every press release has become a perpetual press release.

Here are five ways to manage perpetual press releases:

1. Chances are, the release includes keywords like product/service names that aren’t a part of your current social media monitoring regime. Those need to be added to the watch list. Also, conversations about your news often happen without mentioning the company’s name, so don’t count on that keyword capturing everything.   Heck, in some cases your customers and stakeholders may be talking about your product and even THEY don’t know it (’til you tell ‘em!).  So monitor for concepts that are tightly related to the news.

2. Check regularly for backlinks to the release. Whoever cared enough to link to your news is probably willing to do a Q&A now and get updates down the road. This process is automated a bit if you’re publishing releases on a blog platform like WordPress that picks up backilinks. (Check out this great post on backlink tools for more info.)

3. The comments section of every blog post that wrote about version 2.0 of your product is now a media outlet for the 3.0 announcement. Re-read that…it’s not just the blog that can be approached for more publicity, but the comments section of the old POST.  Put a short comment in that says something like “hey, we’ve got an update on this product now…”  This extends visibility in a number of ways.  One, the post has been around longer than your new news, so it’s is better indexed by search engines. Two, people who left comments were clearly interested in the 2.0 story, so they’ll likely be interested in 3.0.  Most commenting systems automatically email all commenters when a new comment is made, even years later.

4. Logistically, each release needs a long-term caretaker. Someone to monitor and make sure there’s no mistakes in reporting. Another aspect of “perpetual” is that bad information lives on forever via search. Correct it once and the hundreds/thousands of long tail searchers that find it later will thank you.

5. Treat each press release as a location where a flash community can develop. That means enabling comments to be published underneath, engaging in the conversation, and proactively saying “we’re monitoring for posts and are happy to answer any questions.” In this way, the release can double as a really good FAQ. Tip: If you turn off the “nofollow” tag in the comments section of blog, then the conversation will get indexed and more people will find it via search.

Have you spotted any interesting phenomena with old news flaring up?  Any tactics to suggest on how to manage multi-month/year news “cycles”?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Mistakes?  Really?  You really want me to have a section of my 2011 plan that explains we’re going to make mistakes???

Yup.

Feel free to copy and paste the following into your plan. Or not and then say why you think it would be a mistake to do that in the comments.

Mistakes:

We’re going to make them. When we do, we’ll apologize, do everything reasonable to make it right, and then improve our procedures to make sure they don’t happen again. It’s important to recognize that even if we haven’t done something wrong, some people will think that we did.   Social media is too new and evolving too fast to eliminate that risk.  The unavoidable time lag between the “right now” demands of online communities and our ability to update our procedures will likely mean we’ll take some hits.  However, we recognize the potential damage of those hits is much smaller  than what we’ll incur by not engaging at all.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

“Regulatory issues will have to be addressed.”

Too many 2011 PR plans are being written with the “have to” language, and it might as well be an epitaph for your social media efforts.  Are the words true?  Yes.  Do they incite insecurity that undermine organizational change? Yes again.

What if instead you were to say “regulatory issues will be addressed.”  The same limitations are there, but a sense of empowerment is too.

The power of this bit of language — all too common in articles and industry speeches — struck me in a story shared by a colleague who works in the health care sector.

Now, what I know about health care marketing couldn’t fill a thimble, but apparently if you sell a drug and hear that someone had a bad reaction to it, you need to report it to the FDA.  This has scared off many companies from even basic social media monitoring.  But recently someone in the company basically said “ok, the procedure for reporting adverse effects is well known.  Let’s start listening so we can start engaging.  And if we hear of adverse effects, we’ll go through the procedure. ”

Maybe you can’t do 100% of what you’d like to do online because the laws still trail the technology. But I bet you can do 10%, 20%, maybe even 50% of the huge range of what’s possible.

I bet that’s better than your competitors.

I bet that when the law catches up, your superior experience will enable you to jump farther and faster than those who waited.

Delete those two words and you’ll be able to see that fraction of possibility clearer, and the higher ups will be able to sign off on it faster.  Delete those two words, and change 2011.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

After a 100-year drought of good metrics, thanks to social media PR is now enjoying an embarrassment of riches.  So beyond what Google Analytics and Radian6-type services are offering, here are 20 metrics you can add to your 2011 PR plan.  More ideas welcome in the comments!

Cross-department

1. All sales leads - Gives a sense of how big a marketing funnel social media is opening

2. High quality leads - Not every lead will convert, but it’s important to track the viable opportunities social media is generating and then ratios to #1 above and #3 below.

3. Resulting sales - Then track every subsequent sale thereafter

4. Recruits hired - Presumably there’s a cost-to-hire figure that your company has already worked out that you can compare for cost effectiveness

5. Investors referred to IR - Especially if IR isn’t social yet, this number provides evidence of the need

Reputation

6. Complaints nullified – Where even if someone said something bad years ago, but it’s showing up high in your search results, you’ve stepped in to answer so everyone else knows the issue has been resolved.

7. Misperceptions corrected – Even people with good intentions get things wrong sometimes and you don’t want customers, investors or potential employees to have wrong information.  Even if it’s not negative, wrong stuff is taking up the room that right stuff could.

8. Questions answered – Wouldn’t it be nice to say, “Boss, 432 people asked us questions about our company last year. If we hadn’t been there to answer them, they either wouldn’t have the information, or would have gotten it from one else and it may have been  wrong. Either way, they would have felt we weren’t there to help.”

9. Rumors squashed – These spread perniciously on the web. But via search, you can find all heads of the hydra and chop them off.

10. Star rankings of the company’s online materials - Yes, all of them. Anything that’s not working for you is distracting from the stuff that is.

11. Negative pages found via search - There should be an incentive to seek out damaging information so that it can be resolved. This metric is that incentive.

12. Bloggers that hate you and their combined audience - You should know for crisis planning.  (And why do they hate you? You’re a nice person at a nice company.  Surely there’s some common ground you can find to reduce the animosity, or build some level of respect to keep lines of communication open.)

13. Bloggers that love you and their combined audience – Nuff said.

14. Inlinks to intellectual capital - That’s at least as important as the citations to-date.

15. Google profile click throughs of white papers and traditional media articles

For social media trained employees:

16. Linkedin link growth

17. Klout score growth (If you don’t know this metric yet, click the link.  That company is doing AMAZING things.)

18. Blog readership growth (but remember, better to have 50 perfectly targeted readers than 5 million poorly targeted)

19. Job satisfaction (I’m pretty sure this would go up, but I don’t know for sure. It’s worth measuring to find out.)

20. In-person meetings with bloggers/tweeters

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Scrolling through Twitter yesterday, I saw the umpteenth list of “5 Ways to Do X” and “Three Rules that Every…”  So as a joke, I tweeted “2,356 reasons why I’m tired of lists http://bit.ly/makeYourNextBlogPostaPoemOrSomething.iamAhypocrite4doingLists2.

To be sure, I’ve done a few of these lists myself and I do it because they work.  I can tell by the click-throughs. But sometimes you need a break, even from your own writing style. So although it started out as a joke, I decided to write today’s post as a poem.

No, I don’t plan on this being a regular thing :)

An Ode to Living Corporate Values Through Social Media

There once was a flack from Nantucket,
who decided one day to chuck it.

Reporters wanted stories, and he was happy to pitch,
but there were opportunities online for the Inc. to get rich.

On Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook they came,
and always, each moment, they cried out the same:

“Join our group!  It’s about your stuff.”
“We discuss great ideas and there are never enough.”

Back at HQ, it was rough Q&A.
“Should we talk back?” “Is there something to say?”

“Do we want to engage? Are all of them sane?”
(Many had read ’99′s Clutrain.)

“Let’s check our values and if they align!”
Honest and transparency, those checked out fine.

Great service and growth, social media would help,
on blogs, on forums…perhaps even Yelp.

Stewardship made sense, as did innovation.
All would be furthered through participation.

In embracing their values, they had little to fear,
and suddenly 2011 became crystal clear.

“To live our values, we MUST engage!”
And so to their plans, they added a page.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Message bibles are like deodorant.  When they work you don’t know they’re there.  When they don’t, you stink and everyone knows it.

Speaking of which, if your message bible was last updated before social media went mainstream, it’s probably getting ripe.  Why?

1. An unscientific starting point. At best, your  bible drew its word choice from focus groups, industry research, media clips and native industry knowledge.  That’s really good, but it’s not scientific.  With social media monitoring and SEO keyword tools (especially those that measure keyword density), you can count how many times and how often your verbiage appears.  You can see with perfect clarity — in multiple languages — how people describe your company, its products and the issues that affect it.  They even remove the variable found in focus groups of people subtly changing what they say when they know they’re being observed. Companies have been using these tools for industry intelligence purposes, but it’s time PR applied them to messaging.

2. It’s being used as a dead tree.  Like their advertising cousins, message bibles are static devices.  You throw them out there hoping something sticks; hoping even more that you’ll be able to see if it does.  But it’s not meant to be changed often.  Heck, it’s called a “bible” because you want employees to get that it’s really important NOT to change, to stay on message.  (Note, I’m not saying that a company’s DNA or value proposition should change.  Just the language that’s trying to communicate it.)

But with social media, small, but scientifically valid testing of terms can happen on the fly and on an ongoing basis.  Like one of Darwin’s finches, each syllable should be run through the evolutionary wringer, with only the fittest phrases surviving.

Adopting this approach turns your message bible into a living document.  That dead-end corporate speak that someone insisted be in the boilerplate?  Gone.  Courtesy of search results that show it’s not being repeated.  The phrase everyone thought was solid, but not exciting?  Turns out your customers embraced it, spread it through the meme-o-sphere and it’s now the title of your CEO’s roadshow speech.

Like songs in the music industry, you can never quite predict what’s going to happen until you test it.  And people don’t have to worry about being wrong, because everyone’s right when they start off by saying “we’ll do what works” and then use the scientific method to figure it out.

So what do you get with a message bible that social media & SEO helped build?

  • You and your communities speak the same language, lowering the cost of customer acquisition and extending loyalty
  • Your SEO program operates on a different verbal track than that of your competitors, lowering its costs while delivering more.
  • Your communications to customers (via sales and customer service), the media, investors, analysts and everyone else mutually reinforce one another.

What do you think?  What tools and approaches would you use to update your message bible in 2011?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

It’s satisfying to fill in the list of “Key Audiences” in a PR plan. They’re pretty obvious and easy to prioritize. When well defined, the list serves as a north star for the rest of the document, guiding everything that comes next.

It’s such a big help because the term “audience” captures the power structure you’ll deploy. The company speaks and the audience listens. Oh sure, audiences sometimes talk back, but through customer service or letters. Not with a megaphone loud enough to think of them as anything but an audience.
By now you’re probably hearing alarm bells go off with this pre-social media mode of thinking. And yet many 2011 PR plans being drawn up now will include a section on “Audience” out of habit,  warping the company’s ability to see threats and opportunities.

Try this thought experiment:
1. Write “Key Audiences” and list them. Then jot down notes on all the things you want to do to that audience. Raise visibility, differentiate from peers, convince them to buy your stuff, apply to HR…that sort of thing.

2. Now write “Our Communities” and list them. Assemble a quick list of all the things you could do with them.

Do terms like “collaborate,” “cooperate,” “join with,” “ask,” and “build” come to mind?  Were those terms on the list in #1?   The frame difference between Audience and Community profoundly affects thinking and expectations.  (Clay Shirky famously explained this change by calling the audience “the former audience” in his book, Here Comes Everybody.)

Notice how you do things “to” audiences. But you do things “with” communities.

Prefacing “communities” with “our” is also important. It gets you in the right mindset for goal-setting, it’s a catalyst for changing the company’s culture and attitudes towards stakeholders, and it informs the instincts you’ll need to be authentic — not just appear authentic — in your engagements with them.

Which begs another question and change in thinking.  If they’re the former audience, what does that make us?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

It’s September and PR departments ’round the world are thinking about their plans for 2011.  Problem is, the templates they’re breaking out and the old documents they’re flipping through look like they’re from 1986.

So if your 2010 plan didn’t include social media — or worse, it did, but things didn’t go well — let’s take the next two weeks to upgrade it.  First up in this 10-post series?  Changing “Key Audiences” to “Our Communities.”

Here’s a preview of the upcoming posts, followed by a moment of nostalgic reflection with the trailer from Hot Tub Time Machine.

Monday: Changing “Key Audiences” to “Our Communities”

Tuesday: Upgrading the Message Bible for Social SEO

Wednesday:  Applying the Experimental Method

Thursday:  Living Corporate Values Online

Friday:  Five Additional Metrics

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)

© Copyright . All Rights Reserved.